Sunday, July 19, 2015

Week Two Response


I had a mixture of feelings about this week's reading. Bunn's piece had an overall useful message for those trying to improve their writing - read with intention. In this case, read with the intention to become a better writer by looking at why the author made the choices he or she did. I found myself asking questions about Bunn's choices quite before he suggested the reader do so. Why did he include students' perspectives when he could have said the same things himself? What happened to the enjoyable nature of his writing that he began with that quickly died when he switched from storytelling to advice giving?
His message was received, although I would have been happy with a condensed version because, whatever the purpose was regarding his choices, I did not much enjoy them.
Rubin's readings evoked both irritation and enjoyment in me. I read the chapter on mindfulness first, which prompted the most annoyance. I saw the "I" repetition at first and then began her stubbornness to not follow her own advice – to try new avenues for bringing about happiness. Her resistance to trying meditation even once and yet, ironically seeing the benefit of titling activities as “meditation” had my anger level rising. Perhaps she somewhat misjudged her grasp on the meaning of mindfulness.
I enjoyed chapter eight much more and was glad I read it last. I found peoples' suggestions for spiritual leaders interesting and the focus on present moment and death was nice; I especially liked the epitaph at the end. The subject matter of her book makes me want to like the book itself and the writer, but alas it doesn't. Nonetheless, I am glad that she took the initiative to try and become happier and that her journey has and likely will continue to help people do the same, regardless of how it effects me personally.

1 comment:

  1. Erin,

    Your “about me” blurb tells me: Erin is a really, really good person. ☺ The sister-ness, the women’s soccer club/team, the DIY initiative you’ve got… you’re setting an example for all of us, not just your sisters.

    So you took creative non-fiction, huh? Was that taught by Meryl Peters? I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts about the course; I’ve only heard great things.

    Having a “mixture of feelings” about the readings is suuuuuuper normal, and really, I’d argue that it’s unavoidable. Different strokes for different folks. What I think is important to keep in mind is WHAT you value in these readings, what you DON’T, and most importantly, WHY. (Also, please know: I’m going to be repeating these lines in class and to other students on their blogs.) If a writer’s “move”/decision “speaks to you” take a moment to pause and try to figure out why. This is the #1 way, I believe, to become stronger, well-rounded, and more self-regulated writers.

    Great work so far.

    Z

    ReplyDelete