Erin Ingalls-Stout
Prof.
De Piero
WRT339
22
July 2015
Compare/Contrast
When deciding which three journals I
was going to use for this assignment I thought I would look under the Kindle
unlimited section, where you get access to as many books as you can read for
ten dollars a month, and see what was offered. I looked under the memoir
section first, which is where I stayed, and scrolled through tons of options
until I had finally chosen three that sounded intriguing. I purposely tried to
make them as different as possible, hoping for variety in style and story so
that I would actually read them after this assignment was finished. What I got
was memoirs about a monk’s journey, a dog-human bond, and a bipolar woman’s
story.
To get a feel for each writer I read the prologues and the first chapters of each book. I began with If Truth be Told: A Monk’s Memoir written by Om Swami. The cover is of him walking away, his robe flowing in a thoughtful breeze, as if to read his story is to follow him on a journey of peace and self-actualization, which it is. Other than this there are no pictures; the story is told only through his tranquil tone. His writing has a steady rhythm that is soothing and sturdy, giving the impression that his words are reliable and that there is no rush to get to the end; the story is the point, just like the journey of life. His writing is formal with the expectation that the readers will know or find out for themselves what the foreign words mean. He is very honest and insightful in his observations of both what is happening internally and externally, an important quality of a monk’s life, and he uses well-placed dialogues intermittently with his internal dialogue. The paragraphs he uses are shorter in length and easy to follow, each changing with a new element of the story. Swami uses descriptions sparingly, yet is captivating in his simplicity. The insight he has on his journey connects to everything around him, including societal issues and his own faults and ignorance, all the while using playful humor, keeping the subjects light.
To get a feel for each writer I read the prologues and the first chapters of each book. I began with If Truth be Told: A Monk’s Memoir written by Om Swami. The cover is of him walking away, his robe flowing in a thoughtful breeze, as if to read his story is to follow him on a journey of peace and self-actualization, which it is. Other than this there are no pictures; the story is told only through his tranquil tone. His writing has a steady rhythm that is soothing and sturdy, giving the impression that his words are reliable and that there is no rush to get to the end; the story is the point, just like the journey of life. His writing is formal with the expectation that the readers will know or find out for themselves what the foreign words mean. He is very honest and insightful in his observations of both what is happening internally and externally, an important quality of a monk’s life, and he uses well-placed dialogues intermittently with his internal dialogue. The paragraphs he uses are shorter in length and easy to follow, each changing with a new element of the story. Swami uses descriptions sparingly, yet is captivating in his simplicity. The insight he has on his journey connects to everything around him, including societal issues and his own faults and ignorance, all the while using playful humor, keeping the subjects light.
The journey began with him leaving
his family and entire life behind in search of inner fulfillment through
monkhood and so included in his writing is the man who remembers the life that
most of his readers are leading, as well as the nature of the monk he became.
He appeals to what will entertain the reader while simultaneously incorporating
the elements of his new practice that promote patience and wisdom.
I enjoyed each of the readers for
what they have to offer and for the individualized choices they made to best
tell their stories. Only Hornbacher’s is in present tense, which I thought was
a great choice for her, making it more personal for the reader. The first two
wouldn’t have benefitted from that and so I thought them being in past tense is
well fitting. Swami’s writing has the essence of a song, with beautiful rhythm
that is not found in the other writings. I liked the erraticism of Hornbacher’s
writing; it is beneficial for painting the picture of her story. Kerasote’s
writing style most resembles many of the books I’ve read in the past, yet his
playfulness in perspective makes the story unique and interesting to follow.
All of them use humor, which I personally appreciated, and incorporate dialogue
that helps to keep a balanced flow. Each writer has an individual style with
elements that I found captivating and worth adding to my own writing.
Ingalls,
ReplyDeleteYou really captured these writers’ styles: Other than this there are no pictures; the story is told only through his tranquil tone; he uses well-placed dialogues intermittently with his internal dialogue; [Swami] He tells much of his story through descriptions that are worded with many short, staccato-like adjectives.” Great characterizations of these difficult-to-describe writing qualities. I’m impressed.
Something’s up with the images—they’re not showing up for me. Any chance you could take a minute to re-upload them?
Nice job with this assignment, Ingalls.
Z
I tried to re-upload them, but they're not showing. I'm not very technologically savvy :(
Delete